Editorial standards
and corrections
Our articles should help you understand an engineering decision, examine its tradeoffs and check the evidence behind it.
Standards adopted . This policy does not certify that every older article has undergone a new review.
Who is credited
Aatvi AI Team is a corporate byline, not a fictional person. A named byline identifies the person credited with an article; it is not a claim that the person independently tested every example. We retain existing credits unless an attribution correction is confirmed. A separate reviewer credit is used only when that review is recorded, with its date. No reviewer credit means no separate review is being claimed.
AI assistance
AI tools may assist with research exploration, outlines, drafting, editing and explanatory visuals. AI output is not a source of evidence or an independent reviewer. The publishing standard is to check factual claims against appropriate sources and to explain important limitations; an AI-generated draft alone does not meet that standard. The diagrams added with this policy are conceptual illustrations, not product screenshots or measured customer outcomes.
Sources, examples and uncertainty
Prefer original documentation, standards and research for technical claims. Link sources close to the relevant discussion or in source notes so readers can inspect their scope and date. Separate a recommendation from an established fact, and label hypothetical examples and sample reports. A conceptual explanation is not evidence that a feature is shipped, a customer achieved a result, or a search ranking will improve.
Publication and update dates
The publication date identifies the original article. An updated date is shown when a later substantive revision is recorded. Formatting, byline-link maintenance and search metadata changes do not by themselves make an article newly reviewed. Dates are editorial records, not automatic build or commit timestamps; we do not invent a time of day when only the date is known.
Request a correction
Email hello@aatvi.ai with the article URL, the passage in question, the proposed correction and supporting evidence. Please do not send credentials, customer records or other confidential material.
Corrections should address the underlying claim, not merely change its wording. Material corrections should include a dated explanation on the article; minor typographical fixes need not imply a substantive update. We do not promise a response time or a particular outcome.